Racism and Slavery in the Bible

Racism and Salvery

Racism has always been an issue in this world ever since the fall. The pride of people’s hearts stirs up in them and for some reason, they think they are better than others. Slavery has been a pitiful thorn in our society, which goes back thousands of years. One clear example we see people who are oppressed is in Egypt. The Egyptian ruler of the time oppressed the people of God (Israelites) into forced slavery to build their empire (Ex 1:8-13). Some people today who call themselves Christians say that the Bible advocates slavery and use verses like Genesis 9:18-27 to prove their case (Newbell, 2013). What a poor interpretation of the text! In context, this is where Noah curses the Canaanite people (descendants from Ham) for exposing Noah’s nakedness. The text reads,

Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers. Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant. May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant.

This is the first text in Scripture where a man pronounces a curse instead of God. The previous curse we see in Scripture is when God curses Cain (Gen. 4:11). The curse that Noah proclaims though is to a nation and not a person. The curse was given due to the wickedness and the pagan practices that the Canaanites would indulge themselves in. Matthews (1996), makes the point,

There are no grounds in our passage for an ethnic reading of the “curse” as some have done, supposing that some peoples are inferior to others. Here Genesis looks only to the social and religious life of Israel’s ancient rival Canaan, whose immorality defiled their land and threatened Israel’s religious fidelity (cf. Lev 18:28; Josh 23). It was not an issue of ethnicity but of the wicked practices that characterized Canaanite culture. The biblical revelation made it clear that if Israel took up the customs of the Canaanites, they too would suffer expulsion. It is transparent from Genesis 1–11, especially the Table of Nations (10:1–32), that all peoples are of the same parentage (i.e., Noah) and thus are related by ancestry. This we find at the outset by creation’s imago Dei, which is reaffirmed in God’s covenant with Noah and his sons, including Ham (9:1, 5–6). The blessing that befalls all peoples is carried forward by the Abrahamic promises, which counter the old curses by the blessing received by all peoples in any era who acknowledge the Lord. “Any attempt to grade the branches of mankind by an appeal to 25–27 is therefore a re-erecting of what God has demolished” (cf. Col 3:11; Gal 2:18; 3:28). (p. 423)

The curse was fitting for the descendants of Ham because the greatest of all of Israel’s enemies would derive from Ham: Egypt, Philistia, Assyria, and Babylon (Gen 10:6–13; Sproul, 2005). Anyone who reads the Bible should quickly understand that the Bible is descriptive of slavery but it never is prescriptive in regards to slavery. We see God opposed to the very idea of slavery when He sends Moses to free His people from the oppression of slavery when they are bound in Egypt (Ex. 3:7-12). Later on, in Israel’s history, they are once again subjects of slavery and God delivers them out of the hands of the Babylonians (Isa. 45:1). Furthermore, the Bible actually puts slave traders in the category or murderers, sexual immorality, and people who strike their mothers and fathers which are obviously gross sins (1 Tim. 1:10). We also know from history that people who were under the reading of God’s word lived a life in opposition of forced slavery and eventually led to the eradication of slavery in their countries (Grudem, 2018). William Wilberforce of England, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King Jr who were all devout Christians seeking to destroy the common practice of forced slavery in their times (Grudem, 2018). Grudem (2018), makes a fantastic point that not only were Christians influential in abolishing slavery, but they were also responsible for getting rid of other gross sins,

Historian Alvin Schmidt points out how the spread of Christianity and Christian influence on government was primarily responsible for the outlawing of infanticide, child abandonment, and abortion in the Roman Empire (in AD 374); the abolition of the brutal battles to the death in which thousands of gladiators had died (in 404); the ending of the cruel punishment of branding the faces of criminals (in 315); the institution of prison reforms, such as the segregating of male and female prisoners (by 361); the discontinuation of the practice of human sacrifice among the Irish, the Prussians, and the Lithuanians, as well as among the Aztec and Mayan Indians; the outlawing of pedophilia; the granting of property rights and other protections to women;the banning of polygamy (which is still practiced in some Muslim nations today); the prohibition of the burning alive of widows in India (in 1829); the end of the painful and crippling practice of binding young women’s feet in China (in 1912); persuading government officials to begin a system of public schools in Germany (in the 16th century); and advancing the idea of compulsory education of all children in a number of European countries. During the history of the church, Christians have had a decisive influence in opposing and often abolishing slavery in the Roman Empire, in Ireland, and in most of Europe (though Schmidt frankly notes that a minority of “erring” Christian teachers have supported slavery in various centuries). In England, William Wilberforce, a devout Christian, led the successful effort to abolish the slave trade and then slavery itself throughout the British Empire by 1840. (pp. 475-476)

A very crucial point to understand with the ancient idea of slavery and how it was historically practiced was due to large amounts of debt people accrued, a crime made against another party, or in other cases, it was because of war (McQuilkin & Copan, 2014). People would voluntarily submit themselves in servanthood to pay off their debts or to pay for their crimes to a family they wronged (McQuilkin & Copan, 2014). The people who were servants were treated as ordinary people instead of the mere thought of property since they were made in the image of God (Gen. 1:27; Ex. 21:20-27; Job 31:13-15).

Despite the wickedness that people have in their hearts to pervert the image of God in which God created us in, God always finds a way to paint a picture of beauty inside evil. God takes a word like slavery, and then He uses that imagery to show us that slavery has all the features of our redemption built in it. As slaves, the children of God are chosen (1 Peter 1:1; 2:9; Eph. 1:4), they are bought (1 Cor. 6:20, 7:23), the Master owns them (1 Cor. 6:19; Rom. 14;7-9; Titus 2:14), and are subject to the masters will and control over us (Acts 5:29, Rom. 6:16-19, Phil. 4:19). Believers will ultimately be called to account (Rom. 14:12); evaluated (2 Cor. 5:10), and either chastened or rewarded by Him (1 Cor. 3:14; Heb. 12:5-11).

What a beautiful and wonderful God He is to make all things good (Rom. 8:28).

References

Grudem, W. (2018). Christian Ethics: An Introduction to Biblical Moral Reasoning. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

Mathews, K. A. (1996). Genesis 1-11:26(Vol. 1A). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.

McQuilkin, R., & Copan, P. (2014). An introduction to Biblical ethics: Walking in the way of wisdom (Third ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. 

Newbell, T. (2013). Beyond color blind: Why race still matters. Retrieved from http://christandpopculture.com/beyond-colorblind-why-race-still-matters/

Schmidt, A. J. (2004). How Christianity Changed the World. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Sproul, R. C. (Ed.). (2005). The Reformation Study Bible: English Standard Version. Orlando, FL; Lake Mary, FL: Ligonier Ministries.

What is Original Sin?

Original Sin 

When the word sin gets thrown around, it is usually helpful to discuss what this actually means. Once this definition is laid out, then one can properly define what original sin means. When it comes to the word sin, theologians have come up with a fancy word to study this and it is called hamartiology (Bird, 2013). Sin can be described as the act that broke humankind’s relationship with God (Bird, 2013). Many words throughout the Old Testament and New Testament describe the nature of sin: lawlessness (Gk. anomia; willful violation of God’s law), transgression (Gk. parabasis; crossing over a boundary), rebellion (Gk. apeithes; deliberate rejection), perversion (Gk. diastrepho; bent or twisted), and missing the mark (Gk. harmatia; Bird, 2013; Grudem, 2004). Sin is the despising of God, an attempt to dethrone God, the worship of self, and “is the evil that emerges in the absence of good” (Bird, 2013, p. 670). McQuilkin and Copan (2014) summarize sin this way, 

Sin is a departure from the character and will of God—a deviation from the way things ought to be. Shalom (“peace”) in the Old Testament represents life that is well-ordered, whole, flourishing, and right with God and others. By contrast, sin is anti-shalom. (p. 158)

When it comes to the doctrine of original sin or the peccatum originale, this describes more of the outcome or inheritance people suffer today due to the original rebellion against God done in the Garden during the beginning of humanity (Gen 3; Berkhof, 1938; Diffey, 2015; Hodge, 1997). Due to the craftiness, deceit, pollution, and misrepresentation of God’s Word, Satan was able to convince Eve to disobey the very Words of God which in turn caused Adam to fall into sin and disobey God (Gill, 1839; Grudem, 2004). It is due to the fall that pain, thorns, suffering, evil, man’s inhumanity, decay, and even death were introduced to humankind (Berkhof, 1938; Diffey, 2015; Genesis 2:17 & Romans 6:23). Diffey (2015) notes, 

Paul stated that sin and death entered the world through Adam’s sin, and because of this, as well as the sins each person commits, everyone is a transgressor, sinful by nature, and under the just judgment of a holy God.” (para. 9; Berkhof, 1938; Romans 5:12-15, 18-21) 

Original sin thereby is a miserable condition that the human race is born in to by default due to the original fall of humanity (“Grand Canyon University, 2019; McQuilkin & Copan, 2014). It is an inherited guilt that every human suffers from in which people are naturally inclined to evil (Heb. 3:12), they are deceitful, desperately sick (Jer. 17:9), and totally depraved (Berkhof, 1938; Bird, 2013; Gill, 1839; Hodge, 1997). What is interesting about original sin is that theologians actually debate this! G.K Chesterton (1959) has famously said, “certain new theologians dispute original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proven” (p. 53).

Hodge (1997) accurately labels why it is called original sin: 

(1.) Because it is truly of the nature of sin. (2.) Because it flows from our first parents as the origin of our race. (3.) Because it is the origin of all other sins; and (4.) Because it is in its nature distinguished from actual sins. (Vol. 2, p. 227)

Therefore, original sin by nature bends humanity towards sinful acts due to the inheritance of Adam’s sin. Humanities hearts are deceitful and beyond cure (Jer. 17:9), they only think of evil continually (Ge. 6:5; Heb. 3:12), they are filled with a desire for wrong (Ecc. 8:11), and they do not desire or seek after God (Rom. 3:11). Original sin makes people slaves to sin (John 8:34; Rom. 6:16-20). This is precisely why Jesus says, “out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, and slander” (Matt. 15:19). It is these sins and many others that are directly related to original sin.

References

Berkhof, L. (1938). Systematic theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co.

Bird, M. F. (2013). Evangelical theology: A Biblical and systematic introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Chesterton, G. (1959). Orthodoxy: One man's journey to sound belief. San Luis Obispo, CA: The Parable Group.

Diffey, D. (2015). Departure from wisdom. In A. DiVincenzo (Ed.), The beginning of wisdom: An introduction to Christian thought and life. Retrieved from http://lc.gcumedia.com/cwv101/the-beginning-of-wisdom-an-introduction-to-christian-thought-and-life/v2.1/#/chapter/4

Gill, J. (1839). A complete body of doctrinal and practical divinity: Or a system of evangelical truths, deduced from the sacred Scriptures(New Edition, Vol. I & II). London: Tegg & Company.

Grand Canyon University. (2019). HTH-330 topic 2 overview: Moral formation in a fallen world[HTML Document]. Retrieved from http://lc.gcu.edu/

Grudem, W. A. (2004). Systematic theology: An introduction to Biblical doctrine. Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House.

Hodge, C. (1997). Systematic theology. Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

McQuilkin, R., & Copan, P. (2014). An introduction to Biblical ethics: Walking in the way of wisdom (Third ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. 

What is Lectio Divina?

In our Western evangelical tradition, one is probably most attuned to the analytical approach or informational approach when it comes to reading God’s Word. This approach is geared towards in-depth Bible study, exegesis, hermeneutics, original languages, genre, and cultural context. Most people of the West would not be familiar with a formational approach to reading Scripture. Reading the Bible with a formational focus was defined by Muto (2012) by saying it “is reading Holy Scripture and the literature of spirituality in such a way that these texts help us to tune into the inner life form or direction meant for us by God from Eternity” (p. 101). This approach to the Word of God has formed a way to interpret the text called the Lectio Divina and composes of four steps: reading, meditation, prayer, and contemplation (“Grand Canyon University,” 2015). These four steps are outlined in detail below.

  1. When reading the text or while one is in Lectio, one becomes alive in the text imagining what it was like to hear these words as a member of the audience. One is not trying to only understand the meaning at this point but instead trying to experience the passage. Reading slowly and at times vocalizing the text helps in this process and reading the text over and over places one in Lectio (Issler, 2012). Muto (2012) describes reading “not just with eyes and mind but also with the heart by reading and reflecting, and re-reading” (p. 151).

  2. Meditatio is to meditate on the text and one is more focused on the meaning and significance of the Word (“Grand Canyon University,” 2015). Sadly, meditation has been tied up with New Age or Eastern mysticism, and most Christians have failed to learn the beauty that comes from meditating on the Word of God. Scripture actually promotes the value of meditating on God’s Word and can be found coming from the lips of people like Isaac, Joshua, and David (Gen. 24:63; Josh. 1:8; Ps. 1:2; 53:5-6; 143:5; Strobel, 2013). To meditate on a passage, it simply means to “intently focus our mind on a spiritual issue” (Strobel, 2013, p. 126). In addition, meditation is wrestling with God and His truth, it is exposing your own temptations, sins, and hidden secrets to the Lord while discovering His true truth for your life (Strobel, 2013).

  3. The next stage of Lectio Divina is called Oratio, and its focus is on prayer. One is to take the text humbly to the Lord and seek what God is trying to teach them at this point. Illumination by the Spirit is vital here if one is unable to see what God is trying to reveal to them. 

  4. The last stage is Contemplatio which is contemplation. Contemplation has been defined as “the action of beholding or looking at with attention and thought” (Cross & Livingstone, 2005; Strobel, 2013). During contemplation, one’s mind is captivated by the object of beauty who is Christ, and all concentration is made towards receiving this beauty (Strobel, 2013). Pause, be still, wait on the Lord, bow before the Lord, and wait to experience the wonder, mystery, awe, and reverence of God (Issler, 2012; John 14:21; 23; Ps. 62).

It is during formational approach that one can expect to be made aware of their sinfulness and be taken into the space of God’s holiness (Issler, 2012). It is during this approach that one patiently waits and listens for God to speak to them personally (Issler, 2012). In this approach, one makes space for God to touch them in the very depth of their emotional life, not just their intellectual life (Issler, 2012; Phil. 4:6-7). Issler (2012) goes on to say, “we place ourselves in a context of openness to the mystery of God, with no real agenda, as he seeks to touch our lives in the deep places” (p. 123).

Summing up the importance of formational reading of the Scriptures, one Pastor reminds us of the danger that often times the analytical/informational approach leads one into; that is pride.

Most of the books on interpreting Scripture that I have read lead you to believe that the key to understanding the Bible lies in your mind. The best interpreters know the original languages and historical backgrounds of the Bible. They understand literary structure, systematic theology, and many other things. Scholarship can be a great blessing. Every time I use a concordance, a great biblical commentary, or a carefully thought-out theological monograph, I am benefitting from someone’s scholarship. What I am objecting to is the intellectual pride that is too frequently in biblical scholarship, and the pride that makes the mind the key element in our effort to draw close to God. The mind certainly has a role to play in this pursuit, but it is not the chief role.

According to the Bible, as far as human responsibility is concerned, the key to interpreting all forms of divine revelation is found in the heart, not in the mind. The religious leaders of Jesus’ day studied the Bible more than anyone, but because of the condition of their hearts they never heard God’s voice at any time (John 5:37). Humility, not intelligence, has always been the heart quality that moves God to speak to us and enables us to hear him clearly. It is the humble, not the smart, that God guides and teaches. (Deere, 2001, pp. 89-90; Ps. 25:9)

“The main aim of Lectio Divina, or the formational reading of Holy Scriptures, is less an explanation of concepts and more a penetration of the heart” (Muto, 2012, p. 100).

References

Cross, F. L., & Livingstone, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). In The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd ed. rev.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Deere, J. (2001). Beginners guide to the gift of prophecy. Ann Arbor, MI: Servant Publication.

Issler, K. (2012). Approaching formative Scripture reading with both head and heart. Journal of spiritual formation & soul care5(1), 117–134. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=76118145&site=eds-live&scope=site

Lecture 4. (2015). MIN-320: Christian Character Formation. Phoenix, AZ: Grand Canyon University.

Muto, S. (2012). The art and discipline of formative reading: Revisiting Holy Scripture with humble receptivity. Journal of spiritual formation & soul care5(1), 100–116. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=76118144&site=eds-live&scope=site

Strobel, K. (2013). Formed for the glory of God: Learning from the spiritual practices of Jonathan Edwards. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.